Saturday, 16 March 2013

DirecTV Group


I was getting my usual fix of financial news a few days ago when randomly, I decide to take a quick look at DirecTV (DTV). This name has popped up quite a few times among various hedge fund managers' holdings. Warren Buffett holds it as well, through Todd Combs and Ted Weschler. This is the first stock bought by Todd Combs and/or Ted Weschler that passes the US$1bn dollar size threshold, which Warren revealed it in his recent annual report. For this one, I definitely regret that I did not do more work on this stock earlier.

And what did I find? I don't claim to be an expert on the America media industry, but DTV definitely piques my interest.. In fact, DTV is a rather typical Buffett stock. Ladies and gentlemen, this is a "cannibal".  What does that mean? Basically it is a company which uses large proportion of their cashflow to buy back their stock. One of Charlie Munger's tips for investment success is to look for "cannibals".


DTV is a satellite TV provider in the USA and Latin America. It also owns a 42% interest in Game Show Network, a network dedicated to game related programming and internet interactive game playing. That is a small part of the business and not so significant. Pay TV in the US is very competitive and have multiple players including: Cable TV, Telcos and Internet TV. The cable infrastructure, telco fiber optic line and internet penetration are all well developed. Pay TV penetration is also very high, at ~90%. Whereas in many parts of Latin America, Pay TV penetration is still growing from a low base. Some stats on their US and LatAm business below.

  2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
DTV US Subscribers ('000) 16,831 17,621 18,560 19,223 19,885 20,084
ARPU (US$) 79.1 83.9 85.5 89.7 93.3 97.0
DirecTV US Revenue 15,527 17,310 18,671 20,268 21,872 23,235
DirecTV US operating profit 2,402 2,330 2,410 3,290 3,702 4,153
DirecTV LatAm subscribers ('000s) 3,279 3,883 4,588 5,808 7,871 10,328
Latam ARPU (US$) 48.3 55.1 58.0 58.0 62.6 57.3
Latam Revenue 1,719 2,383 2,878 3,597 5,096 6,244
Latam operating profit 159 426 331 623 916 955

As expected, their US business is fairly mature. Number of subscribers have been growing at low single digits. The management has been focusing on increasing ARPU, which translated into higher revenue growth compared to subscriber growth. This is unlikely to persist for long. Their LatAm business is where the excitement is. Just a flavor of how the LatAm Pay TV market is like:

(i) Brazil Pay TV penetration - 36%
(ii) Argentina Pay TV penetration - 62%
(iii) Venezuela Pay TV Penetration - ~40%
(iv) Colombia Pay TV Penetration - 31%

However, LatAm is only 1/5 of their revenue as of end 2012 but is growing strongly.

Income Statement (US$m) 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Revenue 17,246 19,693 21,565 24,102 27,226 29,740
Broadcast Programming and other (7,346) (8,298) (9,064) (10,074) (11,655) (13,028)
Subscriber service expenses (1,240) (1,290) (1,525) (1,681) (1,911) (2,137)
Broadcast operation expenses (323) (360) (341) (350) (389) (414)
Subscriber acquisition costs (2,096) (2,429) (2,773) (3,005) (3,390) (3,397)
Upgrade and retention costs (976) (1,058) (1,092) (1,169) (1,327) (1,427)
General and admin expenses (1,095) (1,243) (1,457) (1,445) (1,576) (1,815)
Depreciation and amortization expenses (1,684) (2,320) (2,640) (2,482) (2,349) (2,437)
EBIT 2,486 2,695 2,673 3,896 4,629 5,085
Other income, gains and losses 26 55 34 69 84 140
Liberty transaction and related gain 0 0 (491) 67 0 0
Financial income 111 81 41 39 34 59
Financial expenses (235) (360) (423) (557) (763) (842)
Profit before Tax 2,388 2,471 1,834 3,514 3,984 4,442
Tax (943) (864) (827) (1,202) (1,348) (1,465)
Net Profit 1,445 1,607 1,007 2,312 2,636 2,977

EBIT  Margin 14.4% 13.7% 12.4% 16.2% 17.0% 17.1%
Net Margin 8.4% 8.2% 4.7% 9.6% 9.7% 10.0%


Programming Cost/Revenue 42.6% 42.1% 42.0% 41.8% 42.8% 43.8%
Subscriber acquisition/Revenue 12.2% 12.3% 12.9% 12.5% 12.5% 11.4%
Upgrade and retention/Revenue 5.7% 5.4% 5.1% 4.9% 4.9% 4.8%
My main concern here is that margins are at a historical high. While the management has displayed great talent at milking their US business, competition in US Pay TV industry seems to be getting worse. Programming costs are expected to continue climbing and so will upgrade and retention costs as cable companies shifts to HD. 

(US$m) 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Net CF : 3,645 3,910 4,660 5,206 5,185 5,634
Capex : (2,692) (2,229) (2,071) (2,416) (3,170) (3,349)
Acquisition: (348) (204) (134) (617) (11) (16)
FCF 605 1,477 2,455 2,173 2,004 2,269
Stock repurchase (2,025) (3,174) (1,696) (5,111) (5,496) (5,175)
Cashflow from debt issuance/repayment (220) 2,437 972 3,655 2,990 3,690
No. of shares (diluted) 1,202 1,114 989 876 752 644
Recurring EPS 1.20 1.44 1.51 2.64 3.51 4.62

Their LatAm Pay TV business is definitely one of the attractive selling point of this company but that is not all. This is a massively cashflow generative business. Even after plowing cash back into the company for capex and acquisition, free cash flow is almost equal to net profits. This is a cash cow! What is even more interesting is what they have done with all that cash. Between 2007-2012, DTV produced about US$11bn in free cash flow, but they have done back US$22.7bn worth of stocks. The total number of shares have almost fallen by half in the same period of time. The result of this? EPS growth greatly outpacing revenue or net profit growth. 


(US$m) 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Equity 6,302 4,631 2,911 (194) (3,107) (5,434)
Total Debt 3,395 5,833 8,010 10,510 13,464 17,528
Total Asset 15,063 16,539 18,260 18,423 18,423 20,555
Debt/ Asset 22.5% 35.3% 43.9% 57.0% 73.1% 85.3%
EBIT/Interest 10.6 7.5 6.3 7.0 6.1 6.0
Debt/EBITDA 0.8 1.2 1.5 1.6 1.9 2.3

This rapid shrinking of the shareholder base while great, should not be expected to continue at a similar pace in the future. Over the last six years, DTV has greatly levered up its balance sheet to fund its share purchase. The debt to asset ratio climbed from 22.5% to 85.3%. Equity has become negative. While this may seem somewhat scary, EBIT/Interest ratio and debt/EBITDA ratio are still within safe limits. The management targets a debt/EBITDA ratio of 2.5x. Doing something like this will be very dangerous for a business with volatile margins. Historically, DTV does experience some volatility in their margins and there is a possibility of margin compression given the competitive landscape. Overall, I believe their debt levels should be manageable. The management has just approved a US$4bn stock buyback scheme and is committed to fund stock buyback from their free cashflow.

Analysts are projecting ~10% top line growth over the next few years. As of the closing price of on friday, DTV trades at a trailing PE of 12x. FCF yield is estimated to be about 7%. Compared to 10-yr Treasuries at 2% this is definitely quite attractive even though the stock has climbed quite a fair bit. Let's see if there is a pullback to give me a better entry.









No comments:

Post a Comment